This is a guest post by Lewis Winks; Guy Shrubsole inputted to the research.
The government has promised ‘9 new river walks’ in England to extend public access to the countryside, but hasn’t released details of where these will be, nor how they propose to achieve this. Without a rights-based approach, achieving meaningful river access will face significant challenges, and is illustrative of wider issues resulting from a reliance on a permissive approach to countryside access.
To understand this better, we mapped ownership of our local river, the River Dart in Devon, making use of local knowledge, site visits, angling maps, Section 31 Deposits, Companies House records, and a handful of gaps backfilled with Land Registry data. We believe this is the first river in England and Wales to have riparian ownership fully mapped (do correct us if we’re wrong!). The Guardian has covered the research in a story out today.
We can now reveal:
- There are 108 separate riparian landowners from source to sea.
- A quarter of the riverbank is owned by aristocratic estates and new money elites.
- 10% is owned by 34 corporations.
- 7% is owned by farms, and 13% by individuals.
- 38% of riverbank is registered to addresses outside of the catchment.
- 18.7km is owned via offshore companies.
Here’s our map of who owns the River Dart (also click here to open the map in a separate tab):
Largest Dart landowners by riverside / bank ownership
| Location | Owner | Category | Hectares owned in catchment | Frontage (km) |
| Dartmoor Estate | Duchy of Cornwall | Crown | 27,221 | 45.3 |
| Spitchwick Estate | Castle Management Trust (Gibraltar Registered) | Aristocracy / Gentry | 1,620 | 19.0 |
| Multiple Sites | National Trust | NGO / Charity | 1,047 | 11.2 |
| Multiple Sites | Forestry Commission | Government | 1,427 | 9.3 |
| South Devon Railway | South Devon Railway Trust | Corporate | 34 | 7.0 |
| Raleigh Estate | Sir John Edward Victor Rose | New Money | 430 | 5.5 |
| Sharpham | The Sharpham Trust | NGO / Charity | 226 | 5.4 |
| Dartington Hall Estate | The Dartinton Hall Trust | NGO / Charity | 495 | 4.5 |
| Multiple Sites | Dartmoor National Park Authority | Government | 679 | 3.6 |
| Totnes | South Hams District Council | Government | 20 | 3.4 |
| Buckfast | Buckfast Abbey | Church | 157 | 3.2 |
| Buckfast to Totnes | Dart Valley Railway PLC | Corporate | 25 | 3.1 |
| Staverton Estate | Church Commissioners for England | Church | 586 | 2.9 |
| Multiple Sites | South West Water | Corporate | 35 | 2.7 |
| Higher Weston Farm | Ian James Widdecombe | Farm | 101 | 2.4 |
| Hood-Barton Estate | David L C White & Hilary White | New Money | 97 | 2.2 |
| Berry Pomeroy Estate | 19th Duke of Somerset | Aristocracy / Gentry | 1,150 | 2.0 |
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth Town Council | Government | 8 | 1.9 |
| Old Vicarage Farm | Old Vicarage Farm | Farm | 49 | 1.8 |
Ownership of land adjacent to River Dart, South Devon by Category
| Category (all) | count | ha (within 500m) | ha % | frontage (km) | frontage (%) |
| Crown | 1 | 1,849 | 29% | 42.97 | 28% |
| Gov’t | 8 | 685 | 11% | 15.80 | 10% |
| New Money | 10 | 653 | 10% | 16.06 | 10% |
| Individual | 20 | 276 | 4% | 10.26 | 7% |
| NGO / Charity | 12 | 919 | 14% | 19.65 | 13% |
| Farm | 18 | 542 | 8% | 11.08 | 7% |
| Church | 3 | 273 | 4% | 4.68 | 3% |
| Corporate | 34 | 328 | 5% | 15.50 | 10% |
| Aristocracy / Gentry | 2 | 957 | 15% | 19.51 | 13% |
| TOTALS | 108 | 6,483 | 155.52 | ||
| Absentee owners only (outside of catchment) | count | ha (within 500m) | % of all ha ownership (within 500m) | frontage (km) | % of all frontage ownership |
| Domestic | 36 | 1,565 | 24% | 36.32 | 23% |
| Offshore | 2 | 880 | 14% | 18.76 | 12% |
| TOTALS | 38 | 2,445 | 38% | 55.08 | 35% |
When ownership is this fragmented, securing permissive public access is likely to be a logistical nightmare. Each stretch would require time-consuming negotiations with dozens – if not hundreds – of individual landowners and corporate bodies, many of whom are difficult to identify or are based outside of the river catchment. The River Dart is just one example – but the situation along other, longer rivers is likely to be even more complex.
That’s why we’re calling for a rights-based approach to river access – similar to the system in Scotland, where the public has the right to responsibly walk, swim, paddle and canoe along most rivers and lochs, with sensible exceptions.
In England, our rivers are under pressure from pollution and are too often cut off from public connection. Community groups like Friends of the River Dart are working hard to protect and restore rivers, despite limited access and unclear ownership. We hope this mapping will support their efforts, inspire others to investigate who owns their local rivers, and present the case that meaningful access must be based on rights – not on tenuous and piecemeal negotiation.
Notes:
- The Spitchwick Estate, which own 19km of riverbank, and is owned offshore in Gibraltar, have previously tried to prevent access for swimming at popular swimming spots on Dartmoor (see the Times and Totnes Today).The signs remain up, although the estate also owns River Dart Country Park, which charges visitors for – amongst other things – swimming in the Dart!
- South West Water own nearly 3km of waterfront, which has no public access.
- ‘Frontage’ is classed as landownership by distance along the river in km.
surely time to reverse this medieval situation – if not what’s the use of a Labour government?
LikeLike
“if not what’s the use of a Labour government?”
To make the Tories look acceptable?
LikeLike
I was intrigued to visit Lover’s Leap on foot earlier this year and was pleased to find I could walk to that stretch from near Buckland in the Moor without passing any ‘Private’ or ‘No Access’ signs. However there were such signs on the backs of gates as we headed out, around the Southern side of Ausewell woods. But there are many lovely but inaccessible stretches in that area on either bank and it’d be great if the situation regarding access could be changed.
LikeLike